CGT-focused biomanufacturing facilities require new considerations from real estate developers. They must address stringent regulatory and quality standards, increased customization needs, varied investment strategies and evolving tenant preferences.
Biomanufacturing facilities are obligated to adhere to strict regulations such as Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) standards or the even more rigorous Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP), which are enforced by the FDA. To be compliant, these facilities, particularly CGT facilities, must be state-of-the-art. This commitment to quality is also reflected in how modern therapeutic companies prioritize quality control and onshore availability during the manufacturing process. As the biomanufacturing industry evolves, developers are increasingly recognizing the value of GMP/cGMP facilities and investing in them more. These facilities share fundamental traits with industrial structures, particularly costly infrastructure systems that are unlikely to be moved, fostering long-term tenant retention and minimizing the need for subsequent tenant modifications. Moreover, most tenants finance their own specialized enhancements.
Each of these spaces requires a bespoke approach tailored to each tenant. This customization includes infrastructure requirements such as heavy power systems, cold rooms, specialized HVAC systems and reinforced flooring. Collaboration between landlords and tenants becomes crucial, extending beyond financial considerations. It encompasses joint decisions on architect and contractor approvals, shared space planning responsibilities, coordinating permit acquisition and agreement on costs under the tenant improvement allowance. The size of these facilities varies, with those producing complex small-molecule medicine batches generally ranging from 40,000 to around 100,000 sq. ft., while mega-scale facilities are over one million sq. ft., like those owned by Genentech Vacaville and Fujifilm Holly Springs. This variety of needs exemplifies the complex nature of biotech and, more specifically, biomanufacturing space design and construction.
Investors have adopted various strategies to meet growing demand for specialized real estate infrastructure. These approaches include traditional leases, ground-up development, purpose-built projects, sale-leaseback transactions and shell conversions.
Tenant preferences are moving towards either converted buildings or purpose-built shell structures. Converted spaces leverage structural alterations and cost-saving measures to disrupt the traditional leasing model. In contrast, purpose-built life sciences campuses offer tailored solutions that align with the evolving needs of the industry. This has sparked discussions about regional variations in landlord contributions, influencing lease rates and, consequently, landlords' returns. The vast majority of leasable GMP/cGMP space is built as improved shell and only converted to biomanufacturing upon lease commitment by a tenant. This same improved shell can be repurposed for clean tech, microelectronics and other applications. As developers are confronted with the daunting task of securing limited greenfield sites or repurposing existing industrial properties amid intensifying competition, this enables the landlord more flexibility in potential service offerings and broadens the competition for this useable biomanufacturing space.